iPhone 3G is Cheaper* · Wednesday, June 11, 2008

I purchased a first-generation iPhone the day that it came out. Its been a wonderful purchase from the start, in spite of the fact that it cost me $599. Sure, thats a lot of money, but I always felt like I was getting my money’s worth out of the hardware. The first iPhone was the best iPod, best mobile browsing device, and best phone. When Apple reduced the price to $399, I thought that this was an absolute steal.

When I first heard rumors that the iPhone 3G was going to cost less than the current iPhone, I had guessed that this was pure rumor and speculation. There is no way that Apple would sell the iPhone for less than $399, as it would force them to restructure the pricing for their iPod line. By the same token, I couldn’t fathom Apple allowing ATT to subsidize the phone, because this would mean that ATT would be making this subsidy back up by somehow gouging the customer in service fees. Apple did an excellent job of standing up for the consumer with the first iPhone, by negotiating a low-price data plan and allowing for at-home activation through iTunes.

Needless to say, I was shocked at the price point that was announced during the keynote. Only $199? And no mention of contracts, subsidies, or rate increases? Was this too good to be true?

As it turns out, yes.

Currently, I pay ATT $20/month for 200 text messages and unlimited data over their EDGE network. ATT has announced that the new iPhone 3G data plan will cost $30/month, and will include no text messages. ATT charges $5/month for 200 text messages, which means that the iPhone data plan is effectively being increased by $15/month, representing a 75% increase over the existing data plan.

Over the course of the two year contract, an iPhone 3G will cost you a full $360 more than a first-generation iPhone would. This means that with the same ATT service plans, the $199 8GB iPhone 3G will actually end up costing you $559, where an 8 GB iPhone 1.0 will cost you only $399, representing a savings of $160! The iPhone 3G isn’t cheaper at all, it is in fact far more expensive.

Compounding this is the fact that if I upgraded, I’d likely give my current iPhone to my wife, and have to pay an additional $20/month for her data plan. By my math, getting a new iPhone 3G would cost me a minimum of $1039 over two years. Yikes!

So, I’ll be passing on the new “cheaper” iPhone, and keeping my iPhone 1.0. I’ll be able to run all the great new third-party applications, and will have every feature that my iPhone 3G toting friends will have, apart from 3G speed and GPS. As much as I hate the EDGE network, and would like to have GPS, those features simply aren’t worth over a thousand dollars to me. Here’s hoping that Apple and ATT come up with something more compelling and consumer-friendly, rather than misleading consumers.

Comment

  1. Isn’t it fitting that you pay more for more (better/faster network)?
    Eman    779 days ago    #
  2. Not when they are marketing the iPhone 3G with the following tagline: “Twice as Fast. Half the Price.”
    Jonathan LaCour    779 days ago    #
  3. You can always turn off 3G support :-)
    Philipp Bunge    779 days ago    #
  4. Actually, Phillip, I am pretty sure you can’t. I believe that ATT requires you to sign a two-year contract and requires you to sign up for the $30/month data plan.
    Jonathan LaCour    779 days ago    #
  5. The crappy thing is getting a voice+data plan anywhere is that price now.

    I will not pay $70+ a month for a phone, so I ruled out the iPhone (even though I love the phone itself). To prove how rediculous that price is, I just looked into how much it would cost to buy an alternative Smart Phone on the market. Guess what: You can’t get an unlimited data plan from Verizon, ATT, or Sprint for less than $70 a month. Even as a geek, I just don’t need something that badly. Think about how much you spend over a two-year period versus how much actual use you get.
    Eman    779 days ago    #
  6. Now the iPhone is more in line with the pricing of the other data plans. That still means it’s more than the original iPhone, but $20 for unlimited data was always a steal in the first place. So now they’re upping the price based on the fact that people with faster data connections are likely to download more data.

    I’d prefer to pay $20, but I bet that AT&T would have still bumped the price to $30 even if the iPhone 3G had still been $400.

    Also, if you’re like me and use more than 200 messages anyway, you’re already paying for a messaging plan. I’ll still have to do that, but the price different will probably be $5 less extreme for me than it is for you.
    fitzage    779 days ago    #
  7. I will be buying the latest toy. One of the reasons is that I am working on writing IPhone applications in Objective C, and Python for the Web. I can write it off as a business expense.

    I will let you lust after mine :)
    Noah Gift    779 days ago    #
  8. Of course I’ll buy one. Check your math on the text messages… It may be included. You may also be interested in this:

    http://gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/06/iphone3gpricecomp2.png
    Kevin Swan    778 days ago    #
  9. Here’s the link to the whole article. The iPhone 2 will end up costing $160 more over the course of a year than the original iPhone.

    Worth it, baby.

    http://gizmodo.com/5015540/iphone-3gs-true-price-compared
    Kevin Swan    778 days ago    #
  10. stop crying over $15 more a month, all PDA phones work on $30 data plan and they don’t do half what iphone does.
    aj    778 days ago    #
  11. Thank God for corporate discounts.
    Patrick Shea    771 days ago    #

commenting closed for this article